Quote:
Originally Posted by mr ploppy
I am against it because it removes the assumption of innocence and puts the burden of proof on the accused rather than the accuser. It also punishes an entiire family for the (alleged) actions of one family member.
|
I really see no issue with holding the legal owner of a computer responsible for its use. It's no different to fining the legal owner of a car if it's caught speeding by a speed camera: if you were not driving the car at the time, it's up to you to prove the fact. If you own something, you are responsible for its use.
Quote:
|
And that's beside the fact that it puts the future of sites like this at risk.
|
In what way?