Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemurion
The point is not that 11 of 13 agreed with the poster of the original article that they believe DRM is necessary to protect sales; the point is that neither the original article nor you have offered any evidence that it does so.
We've offered evidence that the lack of DRM does not inhibit sales; you haven't offered any to the contrary.
|
Er, my point was never that inhibited sales: my point was that large scale casual sharing would happen in the absence of DRM and make it unprofitable for publishers and authors.
So far I have seen no convincing argument that it won't happen, and plenty of evidence from the music industry that it will.