View Single Post
Old 03-20-2011, 12:31 AM   #24
thrawn_aj
quantum mechanic
thrawn_aj ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.thrawn_aj ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.thrawn_aj ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.thrawn_aj ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.thrawn_aj ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.thrawn_aj ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.thrawn_aj ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.thrawn_aj ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.thrawn_aj ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.thrawn_aj ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.thrawn_aj ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
thrawn_aj's Avatar
 
Posts: 705
Karma: 483827
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NorCal
Device: Nook1, Samsung Transform, Nook2
Supermoon, shmoopermoon? -> http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/ba...the-supermoon/

Neil, I'm afraid the two moons story has been floating around for a while now - http://www.snopes.com/science/astronomy/brightmars.asp or http://www.hoax-slayer.com/mars-earth-close.html.

Here's an easy way to estimate out the relative sizes in the sky for a pair of astronomical objects (so, not birds or bees ):
D = actual diameter of object, L = distance of object from Earth

approximate angular size (as we see it) ~ D/L [think of the angle subtended by a very small arc of a very large circle].

size ratio of object 1 to 2 (as seen in our sky) = D1*L2/(D2*L1)

So, using the numbers (closest approach distance of Mars for example) in the usual form of this email, we see that Mars will look about 1.4% of the size of the moon. Impressive from an astronomical standpoint, but hardly twin moons eh?

Last edited by thrawn_aj; 03-20-2011 at 12:38 AM.
thrawn_aj is offline   Reply With Quote