View Single Post
Old 03-19-2011, 05:23 PM   #116
JSWolf
Resident Curmudgeon
JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
JSWolf's Avatar
 
Posts: 79,796
Karma: 146391129
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
Quote:
Originally Posted by jgaiser View Post
The Music Industry is a prime example of the effects of copyright enforcement. Nothing. After all the convictions, threats, etc., folks are still putting music up on the darknet.

Lowering prices will reduce pirating, but will not eliminate it.
The RIAA knows how not to do business. They have their heads so far up their asses, they cannot see daylight.

The RIAA managed to get Napster 1.0 shut down when really what Napster did was increase sales of CDs about 6%. Yes, that's really good for business.

The RIAA raised priced of CDs. CDs used to be about $12.99 normal price and about $9.99 on sale for newly released CDs. People bought CDs under this price structure. Then the RIAA goes and raises prices. Sales drop. Yes, that's really good for business.

So basically, we have the RIAA to blame for the increase in music piracy.
JSWolf is offline   Reply With Quote