View Single Post
Old 03-17-2011, 11:59 AM   #82
rogue_librarian
Guru
rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
rogue_librarian's Avatar
 
Posts: 973
Karma: 4269175
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Europe
Device: Pocketbook Basic 613
[Only tangible goods can be "stolen]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew H. View Post
No. That's not true at all.
It is in most jurisdictions; one of the landmark cases is Oxford vs. Moss. It's certainly used that way in legal circles.

Quote:
35-41-1-23
That seems to be the Indiana Criminal Code? Regardless of their definition (didn't read too closely) I can quote at least a dozen other codes that use the traditional one. Legal scholars usually do.

Calling violations of copyright "theft" is only marginally better than "piracy".
rogue_librarian is offline   Reply With Quote