View Single Post
Old 03-17-2011, 11:38 AM   #140
avantman42
Wizard
avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.avantman42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
avantman42's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,090
Karma: 6058305
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Paperwhite
Quote:
Originally Posted by avantman42
While I would like to see copyright laws change, I firmly believe that terms for existing copyrighted material should not change, whether terms are shortened or extended. Anyone who already has copyrighted material has agreed to a given set of rules - I don't think it's fair to change the rules after the agreement has been made.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elfwreck View Post
How about reverting copyright to the length in place when a piece was originally published, which would put a lot of books & movies into the public domain?

Everything published in the US before 1955 would be in the public domain if the laws hadn't been changed. I don't see how putting things back to the expectations that existed when those things were published hurts those authors/musicians/film creators; after all, 28+28 was enough incentive for them at the time.
I agree. I thought I'd said so, but perhaps I didn't make myself clear.
avantman42 is offline   Reply With Quote