View Single Post
Old 03-09-2011, 12:59 PM   #85
sircastor
Reader
sircastor got an A in P-Chem.sircastor got an A in P-Chem.sircastor got an A in P-Chem.sircastor got an A in P-Chem.sircastor got an A in P-Chem.sircastor got an A in P-Chem.sircastor got an A in P-Chem.sircastor got an A in P-Chem.sircastor got an A in P-Chem.sircastor got an A in P-Chem.sircastor got an A in P-Chem.
 
sircastor's Avatar
 
Posts: 85
Karma: 6124
Join Date: Jul 2009
Device: PRS-505
In modern western society, we define property as being a natural right. That property right starts with yourself, your physical body and what you choose to do with your time, your labor. From there we extend that property right out: You have right to the work that you do in a field. If you labor to build a house, it is yours by virtue of the effort and agency that went into its construction.

On the precept, we base the concept of intellectual property. Just as you can build a house and it's yours, you can write a book and it's yours.

Intellectual property is real because we make it so, and we base it on the concept of physical property because it has the same foundation: Work and effort of and individual.

We establish governments for the sake of protecting these natural rights and that's where the support comes from in terms of a magical barrier, the rules about what you can and cannot do within said barrier. My government (in particular; USA) has grown quite a lot and established a lot of rules which make for complex property right. These rules don't make property less real, but they do make it easier to argue about its non-existence.

Property, both physical and intellectual is definitely real.
sircastor is offline   Reply With Quote