View Single Post
Old 03-08-2011, 05:43 AM   #41
rogue_librarian
Guru
rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
rogue_librarian's Avatar
 
Posts: 973
Karma: 4269175
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Europe
Device: Pocketbook Basic 613
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenMonkey View Post
... I would say the copyright period should be equivalent. Something like 40 years or so. Maybe 48.
Make it 50 years after publication, and split in two halfs, once renewable (at moderate cost). If there's a commercial interest renewing the copyright won't be an issue, otherwise works enter the public domain after 25 years.

The current system of life + 70 years is just ridiculous. It certainly isn't needed to encourage creators to produce their works (does anybody really think they'd create less if they could only reap the benefit for the remainder of their life?) The current system benefits heirs and corporations, nobody else.
rogue_librarian is offline   Reply With Quote