View Single Post
Old 03-08-2011, 03:18 AM   #24
Giggleton
Banned
Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Giggleton ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,687
Karma: 4368191
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Oregon
Device: Kindle3
One problem of perpetual copyright, even limited perpetuity as in to death and slightly beyond, is that it allows for a work that could be very commercial, perhaps even needed by the market, to be un-copyable at the request of the rights holder.

Would someone be allowed to copy a work under a perpetual copyright if they did not profit monetarily from the work?

We would definitely run into some problems about what does it mean to profit? But that could be worked out I suppose.

Giggleton is offline   Reply With Quote