|
I think I will be happy to spend that kind of money on a more full-featured reader when the technology is better. If I could have even better, larger e-ink (or equivalent) screen with more tablet-pc functionality, improved stability and longer battery life, I would pay it. The cost-to-benefit ratio just isn't there for me yet with iLiad. I applaud them for making an innovative product, though.
Speaking of which, that was really what the debate was on this thread today, wasn't it? Not whether the Kindle was BETTER than the Sony or other competition, but is it INNOVATIVE. As rationalbiker pointed out, "better" really comes down to the features an individual values. Innovative is still subjective but quite a bit less so. Better is just so highly personal.
|