Quote:
Originally Posted by stonetools
I have replied to all your points
|
Actually you have not. There were several points you have not answered but I think you know that just as everyone else here knows. You did not answer the question of added value in real world scenarios. Nor did you answer the point about the fact that even if there was added value by Apple (which of course there is not) it would be irrelevant because the product is the content not the purchase of the content. So it would be just irrelevant if the purchase of the content on one of the 4-5 platforms we do shopping on was actually somehow better. Because on the one hand purchase is much much less important then actually accessing the content and on the other hand we buy content on several different platforms as well as we access the very same content from several different platforms. So any one platform of the many is just not a factor because the product is the content. So to summarize: neither is there added value by Apple (and you failed to point out any) nor would it matter even if there was.
Quote:
|
I don't believe you had to personally insult me by claiming that I was being paid by Apple
|
A few things on this:
1. I think you have every reason to hope for us to believe that you are actually being paid for what you are doing in this topic. If you are not even paid for this, can you imagine what we should think then about you?
2. The claim in itself that someone is paid by Apple is not an insult. How could it be? Every company needs workers.
3. On the other hand it is unethical and pathetic that Apple sends its reps to these forums to spread propaganda.
4. A couple of people explained it to you why you are seen as an Apple rep. I personally think that by now it is hard to see your activities any other way. See the first point.