View Single Post
Old 02-26-2011, 10:04 PM   #235
Lemurion
eReader
Lemurion ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lemurion ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lemurion ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lemurion ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lemurion ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lemurion ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lemurion ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lemurion ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lemurion ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lemurion ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lemurion ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Lemurion's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,750
Karma: 4968470
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: Note 5; PW3; Nook HD+; ChuWi Hi12; iPad
Quote:
Originally Posted by stonetools View Post
Convenience. You're buying buying convenience buying your book on the Ipad for immediate use on the Ipad.That would be a difference.
What convenience? I have the Kindle App on my Mac and could be buying the book on the Mac for immediate use on the Mac.

There's no difference.

In both cases I'm using an Apple device to buy Kindle content to consume on that Apple device.

Quote:
Originally Posted by stonetools View Post
Now answer MY questions.

1.Why if this Apple policy change is so deadly to the booksellers, have the booksellers not objected to the change?
2. What really is the true value of an app that is really a storefront through which the seller can potentially make millions of dollars.
1) The only one who has currently been affected by the policy change is Sony, and they have objected.

2) That's irrelevant. The fact that Amazon's app can potentially generate millions of dollars in sales for Amazon has absolutely no bearing on whether Apple is entitled to a cut of sales in which they took no part.
Lemurion is offline   Reply With Quote