View Single Post
Old 02-24-2011, 10:54 PM   #25
carld
Wizard
carld ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.carld ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.carld ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.carld ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.carld ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.carld ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.carld ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.carld ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.carld ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.carld ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.carld ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,698
Karma: 4748723
Join Date: Dec 2007
Device: Kindle Paperwhite
Quote:
Originally Posted by Worldwalker View Post
I didn't say it butchered the author's work; I said it butchered the author's rights.

Fanfic can be better than the original (when I read fanfic based on corny old TV shows, I see this a lot) and it still violates copyright and trademarks. There are various arguments otherwise, based on various fair use exemptions, but the only ones tested in court have come to naught. It's hard to argue that you have some kind of right to piggyback on someone else's creation.
I did some research and realized I was wrong earlier. Fanfiction has actually not been tested in court. I am not a lawyer, but its legality seems to hinge on whether fanfic can be considered either transformative or parody, if so then it isn't a violation of copyright.

Referential works like the Harry Potter Lexicon are different type of fan creation and have been ruled on in court. So far the rulings have gone against fans.
carld is offline   Reply With Quote