Quote:
Originally Posted by Kali Yuga
Read rather than presume.
The IFPI specifically says this is a question of economics, not moral necessity. Their recommendations include a graduated response (e.g. have the ISP's warn the excessive piraters multiple times, with increasing penalties that would still be much lower than civil lawsuits); consumer education; targeting specific infringing services like Mininova and Pirate Bay; pressuring Google and other search engines to cooperate more (e.g. respond better to take-down requests, cull piracy links from searches); and target pre-release leaks.
|
Targetting pre-release leaks from industry insiders would make the most sense. Cut those off and at least it would be in shops before it's on the internet.
Do they say anything about the standard of evidence they are going to supply to ISPs they expect to do their policing for them? Or is it still just the IP address and timestamp that was recently ruled as inadmissible?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACS:Law...ght_infringers