Churchill's The Second World War is a fantastic read on three levels:
1. It's his view of how WWII was fought, instead of a historian's opinion of his point of view.
2. It's a great piece of literature.
3. He wrote it after WWII, while building to a third run for Prime Minister, and as such, it is a political document as well.
The only downside is that Churhill could not reveal in his book that the allies had broken the German's encryption system, so there is no more than hint of how that impacted England's strategy.
Inside the Third Reich was written by Albert Speer, but there is plenty of evidence that he lied at his trial, and lied in his book. He was trying to save his life and his image, but in reality knew full well that slave labour in concentration camps was being used as part of the weapons production work that he oversaw and was responsible for. As with Churchill's book, this one also has a self-promotion element, but go in understanding that it was written by one of the monsters of WWII, not one of the heroes.
I would like to add a third book for your consideration - "Rise And Fall Of The Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany" by William Shirer. He did a huge amount of reading and research back when the Soviet archives were accessible, and while no person could get through all of the documents, he does a fine job of documenting what lead to WWII and how it played out in Germany. Along with the quality of writing and research, I like that the author did not pretend to be an uninvolved observer, and called the acts of gangsterism and brutality what they were.
|