View Single Post
Old 02-20-2011, 03:11 PM   #477
Graham
Wizard
Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,742
Karma: 32912427
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Yorkshire, UK
Device: Kobo H20, Pixel 2, Samsung Chromebook Plus
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horemheb View Post
It is in the press release:
"However, Apple does require that if a publisher chooses to sell a digital subscription separately outside of the app, that same subscription offer must be made available, at the same price or less, to customers who wish to subscribe from within the app."

E.g. Amazon sells subscriptions too. Why would Apple receive money for these subscriptions? Apple does nothing for it. Again, change e-books to subscriptions in my example and you get the picture.
Apple doesn't receive money for those subscriptions made outside the app. This is why your example doesn't work. What they're saying is that they are going to force the developer to put an additional offer inside the app (i.e. in a much more attractive place) and break the link to the offer outside the app. It's that mandatory requirement which is controversial.

Graham
Graham is offline   Reply With Quote