Quote:
Originally Posted by RockdaMan
Probably only during the period of transition. Kinda like how there won't always be a premium on the price of hybrid/electric cars.
|
1. Simple math clearly tells us that it will always be more expensive to pay X+1 players than to pay only X players. There is no way around that. So no, it would not be only for a transition period.
2. Even if it were true (which isn't) that it would be only for a transition period it is still unacceptable that Apple wants money for doing nothing for it. In fact if customer prices would not increase one cent it is still unacceptable to let Apple harvest money for nothing. It is unacceptable in itself.
3. Even if it were true that it would be only for a transition period it would still be unacceptable to demand even a cent more from customers in exchange for nothing.