View Single Post
Old 02-19-2011, 05:30 PM   #424
Graham
Wizard
Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,742
Karma: 32912427
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Yorkshire, UK
Device: Kobo H20, Pixel 2, Samsung Chromebook Plus
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horemheb View Post
The cost of Jack's reading for books he purchases in the afternoon:
Cost = Author + Copyright owner + Publisher + Retailer + Apple

Who would pay for the extra cost in the last example? Of course the customers! Only infinitely naive people would think otherwise.
Except that Apple's rules state that the price cannot be lower outside the app, so Jack's cost of reading would be the same as or lower than Jill's. It is possible, yes, that all prices would rise to cover this.

However, the rules only definitely apply to subscriptions, not individual books, and in the case of subs Apple definitely are providing a service (purchase, renewal, support, refunds) not "nothing in return". Worth 30%? I think not. Worth something? Yes; Google thinks 10%.

Graham
Graham is offline   Reply With Quote