View Single Post
Old 02-18-2011, 01:41 PM   #9
boswd
Banned
boswd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.boswd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.boswd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.boswd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.boswd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.boswd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.boswd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.boswd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.boswd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.boswd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.boswd ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,391
Karma: 1001781
Join Date: May 2010
Device: The Nook, Nook color and Droid X
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf3 View Post
Ironically I did just go to Best Buy today, and was coming in here to ask/talk about just this, as it was making no sense to me!

The Nook poster had a Nook Color and eInk Nook on it, and over the eInk model it had a "new and improved" label...so I'd been wondering if it actually was using a Pearl screen.

Because side by side with a Kindle 3, I was shocked that the Nook actually looked fine as near as I could tell...the blacks looked very dark, less gray than on my Kindle 2, and holding Nook/K3 side by side, I'm not sure I could tell the K3 has a technological edge...I mean I kind of feel like maybe I could tell, but then I'm EXPECTING to see it. Would be nice to have some comparison photos under home lighting conditions!

It's hard to tell under bright florescent lights, as the contrast on my Kindle 2 looked a LOT better under those conditions, while looking kind of murky and blurry and gray under the light I read by at night. I'm wondering if I had a Nook and K3 at home, there'd actually be be a noticeable difference.

Refresh speed was a lot slower on the Nook, but I don't know that that matters all THAT much to me. Interface with the touch screen felt clunky by comparison too, but then 99% of the time I'd just be using the hardware buttons on the side. (Mainly I just found it slower, and don't like the unnatural feeling way the interface gets split up between two different types of screens...just makes navigation feel weirder than on a Kindle, but then mostly you use these to read on, not to navigate around with.)

So...hmm. I wonder why Barnes & Noble hasn't switched to a Pearl? I wonder how they were able to make the last gen screen look so DARK if no one else can? I liked both fonts from the looks of it. For that matter I think I like the text options on the Kindle 3 better than the K2 also, and I can't explain why. It seemed like fonts on the K3 were larger somehow while not taking up more space...which makes no sense.

Played with the Nook Color too, and while I don't think I want one, there's no question it's well done for what it is. Screen definitely seems to be IPS, good viewing angles. Interface feels plenty fast, laid out pretty well. Wish it had the hardware forward/back buttons on the sides though like the eInk one, and I'd like some visual feedback on page changes...and artificial eInk like 'flash', a quick page swish, or something, but it feels like a real, slick product unlike some of the 'off brand' products in the same price range.

I thought the Sony readers actually looked WORSE than the eInk Nook's screen, despite having Pearl screens!...I assume because of the touch screen layer (that I don't even want). I would definitely pick out the Nook as having the more advanced screen if I didn't know, as...well the Sony ones looked more like my K2, and the Nook's text in store looked a heck of a lot like the K3...somehow.

Soooo I don't know. Honestly I suspect I might be happy with a Nook OR a Kindle 3 OR a Kindle DX! If B&N had just thrown in a Pearl screen update though, geez, I'd just go with it for sure, give them a shot. I think I would have gone with a Nook to begin with had it been out at the time I bought my K2. (Came out 6 months later I think.)
I'm soo glad a non nook owner has seen basically the same thing we are seeing. I'll have to get together with my friend and his kindle and take some screen shots. I can assure you it's the same at home as it is in Best Buy. The difference is almost non existant between the two screens but some people on this forum refuse to believe The nook classic's screen really is fantastic.

as far as the touch screen on the nook classic. It seems to be a common theme I've noticed that alot of people start out saying exactly what you are saying,, "It feels clumsy or clunky" but after spending some time with and getting to know it's rhytem they end up falling in love with navigating using the second screen.
I came from an iPhone 3Gs before I purchased my Nook classic, so I was already used to navigation on a capactive screen. I took to my wifes nook right away and could not believe I actually wanted a Kindle.

Once you get to "Know" your nook the LCD screen becomes a joy. There is no way I could go from a nook to a kindle and it's navigation but that's me.

If the screen looks just as good to you then actually who cares if it's not Pearl screen. The whole point of a Pearl Screen is for the added contrast and if it's there already on an ePub device, I'm not sure what difference it'll make.

But good luck to you and let us know how you make out.

Last edited by boswd; 02-18-2011 at 01:44 PM.
boswd is offline   Reply With Quote