View Single Post
Old 02-14-2011, 01:19 PM   #5
Kali Yuga
Professional Contrarian
Kali Yuga ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kali Yuga ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kali Yuga ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kali Yuga ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kali Yuga ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kali Yuga ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kali Yuga ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kali Yuga ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kali Yuga ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kali Yuga ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kali Yuga ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Kali Yuga's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,045
Karma: 3289631
Join Date: Mar 2009
Device: Kindle 4 No Touchie
Quote:
Originally Posted by snipenekkid View Post
I don't see how a site owner could be liable for the tax on a sale they did not conduct though. Amazon is the retailer and the affiliate is simply doing nothing more than hawking the Amazon site and content no more than a road sign.
They're also collecting payments on the purchase though.

The issue isn't settled, but I suspect it has a lot more to do with actual laws as written than our intuitions.


Quote:
Originally Posted by snipenekkid
Add to it that the fact of the Agency 5 there is zero competition...
Uh, no.

Agency pricing does remove two specific aspects of competition -- price and availability.

However, this still leaves dozens of other ways for retailers to compete with one another. Retailers are still competing on: ebook reader and app quality; customer service; branding and advertising; credit options; international offerings; and, as this instance shows, affiliate services.


Quote:
Originally Posted by snipenekkid
I don't see how an affiliate will benefit other than the slim chance they are classified a retail presence which then comes down to does the location of the person or the location of the servers hosting the site constitute the determination of retail presence.
Uh, no. Again. Sorry.

In this case, in theory the affiliate benefits because B&N is going to accept the headache of making sure the sales taxes are taken care of, and that if there is a problem B&N offers to take care of it. These kinds of issues could be a big headache for a one-person blog who picks up an extra $25 a month from affiliate book sales.

Separately, sales tax is determined by the physical location of the purchaser, not the seller. If I live in California (8.25% sales tax) and I purchase something online from a seller in Alabama (4% sales tax), the seller needs to collect the 8.25% sales tax and pay it to California.

So it doesn't matter where the affiliate is located. The real question is whether they hold some tax liabilities, and B&N is telling the affiliates "go with us and you won't have to worry either way."

As such B&N's offer is a benefit -- to the extent that the potential affiliate believes B&N will do what it says.
Kali Yuga is offline   Reply With Quote