View Single Post
Old 02-14-2011, 05:55 AM   #39
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by TGS View Post
Well, as the OP, it was me who claimed that he was being rude. On the basis that he claimed he could only consider writing a children's book if he suffered a brain injury I took him to be implying that those who do write children's books are functionally equivalent to the brain damaged...in other words, less intellectually able than he is. Which I think is quite rude.
I saw the intervew in question: it was a part of the very interesting "Faulks on Fiction" TV series that's currently being shown on BBC 4. It came across to me that he was simply saying that he personally is not able to write at a "lower level" than he does. I didn't take it as a general statement about people who do write for children. But I may of course be wrong .
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote