View Single Post
Old 02-13-2011, 07:56 PM   #8
kovidgoyal
creator of calibre
kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kovidgoyal ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
kovidgoyal's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,450
Karma: 27757438
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mumbai, India
Device: Various
I sometimes think it will be easier to just maintain python 2.x myself. I already patch and hand compile python 2.x for the calibre binaries. Cleaning up the language is all very nice, but I have yet to see an actual benefit to using python 3, given that I long ago trained myself to workaround the quirks in python 2 that python 3 addresses.

About the only thing that would convince me to start a migration effort is if PyQt dropped support for python 2.x. Or someone wrote a really large and really useful library for python 3 only, that I for some reason felt unable to port. I don't see either of those happening anytime in the forseeable future.

Last edited by kovidgoyal; 02-13-2011 at 07:59 PM.
kovidgoyal is offline   Reply With Quote