Thread: Agency pricing
View Single Post
Old 02-13-2011, 06:55 PM   #49
HamsterRage
Evangelist
HamsterRage can name that song in three notesHamsterRage can name that song in three notesHamsterRage can name that song in three notesHamsterRage can name that song in three notesHamsterRage can name that song in three notesHamsterRage can name that song in three notesHamsterRage can name that song in three notesHamsterRage can name that song in three notesHamsterRage can name that song in three notesHamsterRage can name that song in three notesHamsterRage can name that song in three notes
 
HamsterRage's Avatar
 
Posts: 435
Karma: 24326
Join Date: Jun 2010
Device: Kobo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew H. View Post
That is exactly the point I was trying to make when I responded to hamster's comment about price fixing. I.e., he objected to my use of the term "illegal price fixing," and I explained that if it wasn't illegal, it was just setting prices.
Wrong again Honey!

Legal v. illegal is a matter of law, and I'll assume about proving something in court. The big five worked together to use their shared monopoly to force Amazon to conform to a pricing system that neither they nor the consumer wanted. I'm fairly certain that the average man-in-the-street would view that as "price fixing", not "price setting". I do, but I've got to assume that it's somehow not illegal, since nobody's been charged with anything.

I chose my words very carefully in my previous posts, Andrew. If you want to re-write my posts and argue with yourself then more power to you. But keep me out of it.
HamsterRage is offline   Reply With Quote