View Single Post
Old 02-09-2011, 12:45 PM   #4
fjtorres
Grand Sorcerer
fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
Being the curious sort, I just powered up my PB360 and used the "Move to Folder" function to *create* a nested folder destination 12 levels deep and move a test file there. It worked.
I'm fairly certain there is no arbitrary limit on how deep you can go since it's a standard FAT32 file system and the PB360 is LINUX-based.
Now, there *will* be a limit to the length of the resultant *path-name*. I'm not sure what the LINUX path-length limits are these days (256 characters? More? Less?) but I doubt that will impinge on a reasonable organization system. But if you really want to give full-sentence names to your folders you might run into a wall at some point.
fjtorres is offline   Reply With Quote