View Single Post
Old 02-09-2011, 03:51 AM   #519
pdurrant
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
pdurrant's Avatar
 
Posts: 74,015
Karma: 315160596
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catlady View Post
I said already that I don't go by raw numbers for the chocolate. My criterion was effect on the eater's health. That's why eating/gluttony fails as a analogy.
Hmm.. OK, so someone's eating affects their health such that on average they will live one hour less than another person who eats more healthily. Is that gluttony?

How about if the difference in life expectancy a day? A month? A year? five years? Thirty Years?

There is a continuum here too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Catlady View Post
I am not necessarily arguing that quantity doesn't matter, I'm playing devil's advocate. But why should quantity matter in terms of morality?
Quantity doesn't matter for some acts. Murder is wrong whether you do it just once or hundreds of times.

Other acts are moral or immoral depending on permission. Having sex isn't immoral, unless it's without permission.

And for some acts, quantity plays a role in morality, and sometimes even in legality.

And I'm done.
pdurrant is offline   Reply With Quote