View Single Post
Old 02-08-2011, 02:34 PM   #491
pdurrant
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
pdurrant's Avatar
 
Posts: 74,082
Karma: 315558332
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catlady View Post
Not really. I think eating becomes gluttony when it adversely affects the health and well-being of the person doing the eating. I don't know what effect would be analogous for someone who is either uploading or downloading files--a deterioration of one's personal moral health? How do you measure that? By how many file sharers become shoplifters or burglars?
So eating is not immoral, until it affects someone adversely?

In which case file sharing of copyright ebooks is not immoral, until it affects someone adversely.

I claim that sharing every ebook you buy with one friend is likely to adversely affect at least one of the authors of those ebooks.

I claim that sharing one ebook with 100,000 other people is likely to adversely affect sales of that ebook, and thus adversely affect the publisher of that ebook.
pdurrant is offline   Reply With Quote