View Single Post
Old 02-08-2011, 04:49 AM   #482
pdurrant
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
pdurrant's Avatar
 
Posts: 74,095
Karma: 315558332
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catlady View Post
But I do have trouble understanding in my own head why an act is moral if done once or twice, but immoral if done "many" times, however "many" is defined.
I think this is a variant on the sorites paradox. When does a heap of sand stop being a heap of sand?

When does eating chocolates cross the line from eating to gluttony? Surely not after one chocolate. Two? Three? A box? Two boxes? Ten boxes?

Those who consider gluttony to be immoral would probably class eating ten boxes of chocolates in one sitting as gluttony and therefore immmoral. Few would consider eating one chocolate to be gluttony, and therefore is probably moral.

So. Eating a single chocolate is moral, but eating 10 boxes of chocolates is immoral.

Any help?
pdurrant is offline   Reply With Quote