View Single Post
Old 02-07-2011, 06:19 PM   #467
Catlady
Grand Sorcerer
Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Catlady's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,419
Karma: 52613881
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdurrant View Post
Is it a problem if I share one ebook with one friend? No.
Is it a problem if I share every ebook I buy with 100,000 friends? Yes.

There isn't a number x where:
share 1 ebook with x friends is OK
but share 1 with x+1 friends with y is not OK.
Nor is there a number y where:
share y ebooks with 1 friend is OK
but share y+1 ebooks with 1 friend is not OK
That's rather what a grey area means. And that's why laws include words like "significant".
But the gray area is exactly the problem. I have no trouble with the concept that a wrong action that is done once should be punished less severely than a wrong action that is done more than once. But I do have trouble understanding in my own head why an act is moral if done once or twice, but immoral if done "many" times, however "many" is defined.
Catlady is offline   Reply With Quote