View Single Post
Old 02-05-2011, 09:26 PM   #219
david_e
Seriously?
david_e ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.david_e ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.david_e ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.david_e ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.david_e ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.david_e ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.david_e ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.david_e ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.david_e ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.david_e ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.david_e ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
david_e's Avatar
 
Posts: 529
Karma: 3347562
Join Date: Nov 2010
Device: Kobo Aura HD, Kobo Mini, iWhatever
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maggie Leung View Post
Snark removed.

Please reread post No. 211.

For what purpose would I need to reread your boorish attempt at reprimanding someone else?

Had you simply reread the article as I suggested you would know the article was amended.

"Correction: February 3, 2011


An article on Tuesday about Apple’s tightening of its control of the App Store misstated part of its policy. While the company is requiring e-book purchases within apps to go through its payment system, customers can still use apps to access e-books and other content they bought elsewhere. It is not the case that access to that content will be cut off."


Isn't that what the real concern was, losing access to existing material?

Why would anyone care if retailers are required to have an in app sale option? Apple can require that the option be available but they certainly can't force any customer to use it.
david_e is offline   Reply With Quote