View Single Post
Old 02-03-2011, 11:23 PM   #63
KenJackson
Addict
KenJackson goes to infinity... and beyond!KenJackson goes to infinity... and beyond!KenJackson goes to infinity... and beyond!KenJackson goes to infinity... and beyond!KenJackson goes to infinity... and beyond!KenJackson goes to infinity... and beyond!KenJackson goes to infinity... and beyond!KenJackson goes to infinity... and beyond!KenJackson goes to infinity... and beyond!KenJackson goes to infinity... and beyond!KenJackson goes to infinity... and beyond!
 
Posts: 256
Karma: 112042
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Maryland, USA
Device: Sony PRS-650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Killing Floor View Post
I'm not asking anyone to agree with me. ... I'm just trying to cut through the legalese.
In spite of any appearance of conflict, I appreciate your input.

If I may, I'd like to step back and make an observation.

It seems most of the discussion is about one of two things. One is about the mechanics of what can or cannot physically be done to remove DRM corruption and vague comments about how to do it. The other is what is legal.

But in many of these discussions, it seems like "right" and "wrong" are implicitly equated with "legal" and "illegal". There isn't much discussion about the rightness or morality of the law.

One of America's founding documents, The Declaration of Independence, says We hold these truths to be self evident. That is, many things are right or wrong independent of any government. The goodness of government law is in how well it recognizes and matches natural law.

Some comments hint at this, but there seems to be a void that I find a little alarming.
KenJackson is offline   Reply With Quote