View Single Post
Old 01-11-2008, 08:15 AM   #11
tompe
Grand Sorcerer
tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
No. My argument for making format shifting legal is that it's clearly ridiculous to say to someone that, if they've legitimately bought a CD, they are committing a crime if they transfer the contents of that CD to an MP3 player. That's common sense.
Well, that was not what you wrote. And I still not get it why it is sensible to make it illegal to format shift (for your own purpose) a CD that you have stolen but not illegal to format shift a CD that you have bought. It is the theft that is the crime.

Quote:
"Illegal material" in the context in which I was using it means redistribution of material that you do not have permission from the copyright holder to redistribute.
Why do you not the write "illegal distribution". Why do you every time write "distribution of illegal material"? There is for me a very big difference between these two cases and mixing them up causes confusion.
tompe is offline   Reply With Quote