View Single Post
Old 01-27-2011, 03:34 PM   #76
leebase
Karma Kameleon
leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
leebase's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,975
Karma: 26738313
Join Date: Aug 2009
Device: iPad Mini, iPhone X, Kindle Fire Tab HD 8, Walmart Onn
Quote:
Originally Posted by tubemonkey View Post
If they aren't being sold in the app store, how is Apple being ripped off?
That's like selling subscriptions to folks, but not delivering the magazine to them, but having them walk into Wal-Mart to take a magazine off the shelf.

Nothing nefarious about that.

But if you want to find inconsistency, merely point out that books are handled differently. Amazon and B&N (and others) are able to put a free reader in the App store -- and folks buy the books via the respective websites. And that's ok with apple.

I wonder at the definition Apple has that distinguishes the book practice from the magazine practice.

I have the free Olive Tree bible software on my iPad. If I buy from within the app, Apple gets their cut. If I go to Olive Tree's website and buy a book (the reader software is free, but you buy the bibles and books that the reader works with) -- Apple doesn't get a cut. And there are discounts on the web site that aren't available via the in-app purchase. Again, I wonder at Apple's definitions.

Lee
leebase is offline   Reply With Quote