View Single Post
Old 01-25-2011, 08:11 AM   #83
jbjb
Somewhat clueless
jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 772
Karma: 9999999
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Worldwalker View Post
In your very first post.

You can say that a publisher "can't set too high a price" because you, and you alone, are claiming the right to decide what constitutes "too high". So of course you will always win, in your eyes, because you set the rules and you declare the winner ... and it's always you.

And maybe you're even fooling yourself. You have to be fooling someone.
Why the nastiness? Lee has made a perfectly reasonable point and has explained it perfectly clearly.

Just because it's simple economics doesn't mean it's not valid - he's made it very clear what he means by "too high", it's a perfectly reasonable definition, and his argument makes sense given that definition.

/JB

Last edited by jbjb; 01-25-2011 at 08:39 AM.
jbjb is offline   Reply With Quote