View Single Post
Old 01-06-2008, 10:14 AM   #64
DMcCunney
New York Editor
DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DMcCunney's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,384
Karma: 16540415
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: PalmTX, Pocket eDGe, Alcatel Fierce 4, RCA Viking Pro 10, Nexus 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompe View Post
It depends if the things you are tolds gives you reasons to think that the material is not OK to distribute. Somebody just saying "you do not have the right" without any further arguments or clarification is probably not enough.
OK. I assume you would want some proof from the claimant to back the claim. Let's say they provided it (like, say, a copy of a copyright registration) when they served you with a take down order. That sounds like clear and unarguable infringement to me.
______
Dennis
DMcCunney is offline   Reply With Quote