|
Seems like the problem with the article isn't the research, which makes no mention of ereaders so far as I can tell, but the author's assumption that ereaders are easier to read than paper books. Given the differences in font, text size and material quality between different books, I don't see how that claim makes sense.
Easier to read than a 60 year old yellowed mass market paperback? Sure. A quality new hardcover or even trade paperback? I'm skeptical.
|