View Single Post
Old 01-19-2011, 04:51 PM   #37
CWatkinsNash
IOC Chief Archivist
CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
CWatkinsNash's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,950
Karma: 53868218
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Fruitland Park, FL, USA
Device: Meebook M7, Paperwhite 2021, Fire HD 8+, Fire HD 10+, Lenovo Tab P12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sydney's Mom View Post
If the question is electromagnet waves, then why does my kindle matter. Of course, I don't have the wireless on, but the flight attendant says "anything with a battery" So, I place it in its case, on my lap, and read secretly. As I suspected, that is a rule just so the flight attendants don't have to make decisions - is it a phone, a music player, a game boy . . .
Only narrowband electromagnetic interference is from wireless transmitting devices. Broadband EMI can be emitted from many electronic devices. Hence, the "anything with a battery", including your Kindle. Not only does a blanket rule prevent having to itemize "allowed items", it also covers the possibility of a malfunctioning device emitting more than the usual amount of EMI. (It's been a while since I studied this stuff, but I think I've got that right.)
CWatkinsNash is offline   Reply With Quote