Quote:
Originally Posted by jocampo
Not correct.
The Kindle 3 has most recent hardware than Nook 1st gen. Just the screen itself uses a new and totally different technology which makes it way much clear than the Nook.
The color screen drains a lot of battery and it's, even with firmware upgrade, unresponsive and erratic. Also, the firmware updates basically fixed lot of bugs and did not add too many new features: there is no landscape mode in the Nook, no way to enlarge embedded pictures, no native PDF support and it's heavier...
You must be nuts if you believe Nook 1st gen hardware is better than Kindle 3.
|
totally correct, people don't have to take my word on it or yours. People go to their local best buy and view them side by side. And I guantree you no one will walk away saying the kindle is 50% better. NO ONE.
also it was only the first two updates that focused more on bug fixes, it's last three firmware upgrades on the nook have all been performance and feature enhancements. From faster page turning to the ability to create shelves etc. Darker text
the Kindle hardware is YEARS beyond. What you are referring to is their software. The Sony uses a full touch screen navigation tech, the nook fuses together touch screen lcd tech and eink tech.
The kindle uses outdated push button navigation controls. Akin to tech of the 1990's. There is nothing I mean NOTHING techinally advanced about the kindle's hardware.
Please enlighten me and tell me exactly what does the pearl sceen bring to the advanced technological table besides a better contrast ratio I would to hear it. I mean nook was able to achieve almost the same contrast by a simple upgrade. Again people can go judge for themselves in person.
So whatever your hatred is towards Barnes and Noble at least be honest in your posts.