View Single Post
Old 01-17-2011, 09:13 AM   #18
mgmueller
Member Retired
mgmueller ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mgmueller ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mgmueller ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mgmueller ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mgmueller ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mgmueller ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mgmueller ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mgmueller ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mgmueller ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mgmueller ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mgmueller ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
mgmueller's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,308
Karma: 13024950
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Augsburg (near Munich), Germany
Device: 26 Readers, 44 Tablets
Quote:
Originally Posted by GA Russell View Post
Here's a news article making the rounds among US newspapers that criticizes speed reading and promotes what is called "deep reading".

I took a speed reading course one summer when I was in high school, and after it was over I didn't buy into it, and I never have. I don't believe that people who read particularly rapidly properly digest the ideas they are reading.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...reading11.html
I think it totally depends on the subject matter.
While studying, I've used that technique.
We used to call it "mini-max principle". Meaning: Maximum results with minimal effort.
If you have to get an understanding of hundreds of pages within 1 or 2 days, you only can do this by some kind of speedreading technology. And I find it perfectly workable.
BUT: For me, this kills all the joy of reading. I'd never use this for casual reads. For endless pages of information though...
mgmueller is offline   Reply With Quote