View Single Post
Old 01-16-2011, 09:25 AM   #16
cutterjohn42
Addict
cutterjohn42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cutterjohn42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cutterjohn42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cutterjohn42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cutterjohn42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cutterjohn42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cutterjohn42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cutterjohn42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cutterjohn42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cutterjohn42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cutterjohn42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 274
Karma: 1029955
Join Date: Feb 2009
Device: Palm IIIx, EBM-911, REB-1100(dead), PRS-505
Quote:
Originally Posted by nook12 View Post
Do you have the code for that 50% off?

I also switch gadgets all the time and probably won't use this for more than a year so the extended warranty is worthless for me.

HOWEVER, the reason i will get the Squaretrade warranty is because fo the accidental damage coverage. If you drop your NC, spill coffee on it, or someone steps on it, Squaretrade will replace/fix/reimburse you for how much you paid.

That's the only reason I think a $30 is worth it. after 6 months to a year, you could probably buy a better e-reader or the newer version nook color for the same price or cheaper than you boguht it for now.
I wouldn't be so sure about a new Nook. The original is still as it was when released and no signs of impending announcement, of course there's no real need to change other than maybe an eInk screen upgrading.

The only thing that I could really see as an enticing upgrade in 2-3y would be resonably priced tablets with Pixel Qi displays PLUS MUCH improve SoCs.

I don't run out and buy a new gadget simply because there is a new one. The new one has to be DEMONSTRABLY superior to my current ones to hold ANY interest to me. In the vast majority of the cases this is just not so, mainly being cases of company A playing catchup to company B, or company b "refreshing"(i.e. essentially using smoke and mirrors in an effort to make the consumer believe that their refreshed version is actually better than the current one when at best the changes are essentially trivial) product A to suck more $$$ out of the consumer...
cutterjohn42 is offline   Reply With Quote