View Single Post
Old 01-12-2011, 03:03 PM   #13
Catlady
Grand Sorcerer
Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Catlady's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,418
Karma: 52613881
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
I get it, really! My question was basically rhetorical.

I just think that the publishers are missing a huge opportunity. I think there are probably a lot of people like me who would eagerly spend money on favorite books that aren't yet old enough to be public domain--like the ones by du Maurier. It ought to be a no-brainer that if a book is still in print after 30, 40, 50, or more years, it should also be available digitally.

I was browing the e-book offerings at my library yesterday, and even though I understand the reasons for it, it just seems WRONG that there's no digital version of Rebecca but there are dozens of Harlequin romance e-books.
Catlady is offline   Reply With Quote