View Single Post
Old 12-29-2007, 04:11 PM   #156
rlauzon
Wizard
rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.
 
rlauzon's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,018
Karma: 67827
Join Date: Jan 2005
Device: PocketBook Era
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Jordan View Post
Therefore, copyright laws have a lot to do with compensation to the author.
Then you need to explain how someone compensates a dead person - as I have asked at least twice so far - and which you have failed to explain.

Until you do, copyright is only for compensation to a few companies who do not generate content.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Jordan View Post
Copyright laws are there to enforce fairness (or morality)
Wrong tense. "Copyright laws used to be there to enforce fairness." The moment the law extended copyright beyond author's death, they stopped enforcing fairness.
rlauzon is offline   Reply With Quote