View Single Post
Old 01-11-2011, 03:34 PM   #40
=X=
Wizard
=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
=X='s Avatar
 
Posts: 3,671
Karma: 12205348
Join Date: Mar 2008
Device: Galaxy S, Nook w/CM7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemurion View Post
Two factors - one this NEA report that showed 55% of women read at least one piece of fiction in 2004 as opposed to 38% of men. Also, romance fiction, which according to the RWA website has a 90% female readership is the largest genre of fiction.

Particularly when it comes to reading for pleasure, women read more than men.

Okay so these numbers don't jive with the post. The author correlates a 1-5 male to female. That would have to have 80% of women and 20% men reading difference.

Also the study your citing a study is based on "fiction". There is a world of difference between stating "Women read more" and "Women read more fiction".

Most couples I'm acquainted with the males and females read about the same. But the females mostly read fiction where the males read a mix of the two.

Me personally I read 2 non fictions to one fiction.

Which brings me back to my original premise the OP is not doing an all encompassing evaluation, s/he made an observation based on the genre(s) the OP reads.

=X=

Last edited by =X=; 01-11-2011 at 03:38 PM. Reason: clearified the post
=X= is offline   Reply With Quote