View Single Post
Old 01-10-2011, 04:56 PM   #506
CWatkinsNash
IOC Chief Archivist
CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
CWatkinsNash's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,950
Karma: 53868218
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Fruitland Park, FL, USA
Device: Meebook M7, Paperwhite 2021, Fire HD 8+, Fire HD 10+, Lenovo Tab P12
Quote:
Originally Posted by david_e View Post
"...but there's still plenty of racy content for sale despite the company's clear policy of prohibiting pornography. We found such titles as (insert title here)..." Not once was the book referred to as pornography.
I've read that statement several times and every way I look at it, it still says

these books = pornography

She mentions racy content, associates that phrase with pornography, then names the books that are "racy". She doesn't have to say "This book is pornography" to be saying it. The intent is clear without any twisting necessary. There's no great leap required to get from "racy content" to "pornography". He may have paraphrased, but his "misquote" didn't change the meaning.
CWatkinsNash is offline