View Single Post
Old 01-07-2011, 07:50 AM   #17
astrangerhere
Professor of Law
astrangerhere ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.astrangerhere ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.astrangerhere ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.astrangerhere ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.astrangerhere ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.astrangerhere ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.astrangerhere ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.astrangerhere ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.astrangerhere ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.astrangerhere ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.astrangerhere ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
astrangerhere's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,755
Karma: 68428716
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Device: Kobo Elipsa, Kobo Libra H20, Kobo Aura One, KoboMini
Quote:
Originally Posted by kennyc View Post
That's all I meant by profiling...

But still I'm thinking that the jury selection should be done by an independent third party (or the judge) without the defense/prosecution lawyers involved.
The ACLU would try to burn the buliding down. Its deemed to be a constitutional right to have a jury of peers, and the defense counsel wants just as much a shot at taking out jurors as the prosecution - if not moreso.

Though on the topic, i'll tell you an interesting story from a civil case i sat in on... the case was a simple personal injury suit. Man A and Man B were in a car together. Man A was driving and they were involved in an accident. Man B was injured and allegedly unable to work for 3 months. Leaving aside the facts of the case, which are a great story in and of themselves, the jury selection was the novel thing.
The counsel sat a jury that had everyone from a 19 year old skydiving instructor and a newly retired NASA astrophysicist. Both sides were sure that the retired NASA lady would take over the jury, name herself foreman. So they were very detailed with thier facts and figures in the short trial. Turns out, it was the 19 year old who was named foreman, but an informal straw poll of the the room as soon as they went in for deliberations.
astrangerhere is offline   Reply With Quote