View Single Post
Old 01-06-2011, 02:12 PM   #77
leebase
Karma Kameleon
leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
leebase's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,976
Karma: 26738313
Join Date: Aug 2009
Device: iPad Mini, iPhone X, Kindle Fire Tab HD 8, Walmart Onn
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonkchapman View Post
I think it's relevant in that the discussion wasn't really about the definition of the word thief. It was about accounting for lost sales. Whether or not the person fits the definition of the word thief, the question remains as to whether or not they would have fit the definition of the word customer had the pirate version not been available.
Is it not likely that authors aren't interested solely in the money aspect? If you don't want to pay me for my work, fine. But you don't then get to enjoy my work. If you enjoy my work that I offer only for pay -- you've stolen from me.

Someone trying to make the point to me, the author, that "it really didn't take money from you" -- that' BESIDE the point. I write for a living, I offer my books for SALE. If I want to give my books away, I will CHOOSE to do so. No one has the right to choose FOR me.

Lee (who isn't an author)
leebase is offline   Reply With Quote