View Single Post
Old 01-06-2011, 12:43 PM   #2
jocampo
Layback feline
jocampo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jocampo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jocampo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jocampo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jocampo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jocampo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jocampo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jocampo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jocampo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jocampo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jocampo ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
jocampo's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,034
Karma: 6980745
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Device: Oasis 2nd gen, Sony DPTS1, iPad Pro 10.5"
Hi,

I'll jump on this one, giving the case no one has replied.

Not sure what you mean with a screen X more robust than screen Y. As an Engineer and IT guy, I can say LCD screens or whatever is made of glass, ceramic, etc, it is more "hard", which in Engineering terms terms means it is more difficult to scratch; the downside and the technology fact is that, whatever is difficult to scratch it is also fragile as well: LCD, Ceramic, etc. Something related with the internal atom structure: covalent bond.

After that boring technology sermon, I would not compare or be worried about what's more fragile or what's not. As an ereader, you should assume that screens are delicate so be sure you protect those with a nice cover and avoid accidental drops. Because what I explained above, I believe eink is not so fragile when you compare to a regular LCD screen, but I am not 100% of what kind of chemical structure eink screens use.
jocampo is offline   Reply With Quote