Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWolf
It's not my rules, it's the rules for how such an event is supposed to happen. You could have 1 page left of a book you read in 2010 and then finish that 1 page in 2011 and say you've read your first book in 2011. That's totally unfair to those who only count books totally read in 2011.
|
where'd ya' get them there rules J.W.?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWolf
I'm not really liking how social groups work. You cannot reply. You cannot edit your posts.
I'm thinking we'd be better off starting a new thread for the books we are reading instead of using the social group. Who agrees or disagrees?
|
no
=
Quote:
Originally Posted by CWatkinsNash
I would vote in favor of something like this, if the mods are amenable to it. We've already encountered the limitation of using just one thread in the group forum. Plus I think this would encourage more discussion about the books we're reading and such. Since it's still early, the transition would be easy and we might get more people to join in.
So, +1 from me if the mods are willing to accommodate us.
Edited to correct horrible misuse of the letter "o"
|
no