View Single Post
Old 12-30-2010, 10:40 AM   #200
Catlady
Grand Sorcerer
Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Catlady's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,419
Karma: 52613881
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew H. View Post
No. Fair use is not a "right." Fair use is an exception to the *copyright* statute. Fair use means that certain acts do not legally constitute *copyright* infringement. Fair use only applies to copyright law. Fair use doesn't allow you to shoplift a book (because it's not an exception to the theft statute), nor does it allow you to snip a passage out a book in a store (because it's not an exception to the vandalism statute). Fair use doesn't allow you to violate the DMCA because that's a completely *different* law to which fair use has no application.

Yes. And like fair use, the DMCA exceptions are only exceptions to the DMCA; you can't infringe copyright to get a book that allows reading aloud just because it is permitted by the dmca in the same manner that you can't invoke fair use to violate the DMCA.
How does the simple act of stripping DRM rise to the level of copyright infringement?
Catlady is offline   Reply With Quote