View Single Post
Old 12-27-2010, 08:01 AM   #32
MovieBird
TuxSlash
MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
MovieBird's Avatar
 
Posts: 392
Karma: 2436547
Join Date: Oct 2009
Device: GlowNook
Quote:
Originally Posted by tubemonkey View Post
We used $500 slide rules. The $400 models weren't up to the task.
No student needs a computer, as there are computer labs all around any campus. Getting time on one of those labs during the hours they're open, especially when a project is due in a couple of days... is a bit difficult to say the least.

However, if the student is in the (hard) sciences or math, a netbook simply won't cut it. I was an engineering major, and had to learn 4 different CAD programs during school. You can't do CAD on a netbook, there's simply not enough processing power to run the display, let alone compute the Finite Element Analysis.

My friends in Chemistry/Physics/etc. also wrote quite a bit of code; most of it in MATLAB. This is not a lightweight IDE. Sure, you could write it on a netbook, but it would take a loooooong time to execute a script. They also used CAD a little bit.

As far as textbooks... Yeah, they cost as much as a mid range laptop every term. My costs averaged $600 a quarter. The structural engineers had ONE class where they were required to spend $450 for two texts. Add in your other three and you're closing in on a grand for the term.
MovieBird is offline   Reply With Quote