View Single Post
Old 12-24-2010, 06:59 AM   #81
gmw
cacoethes scribendi
gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
gmw's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,818
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Accessibility IS important - at least I think it is. Is anyone saying otherwise? ...
Well that depends on how you read this thread. I have already been found wanting in my understanding of people's opinions/statements, so I could be wrong ... but here goes.

There seem to be quite a number of explicit statements/opinions that popularity has nothing to do with a book being well written. What I was attempting to do was gently lead in to the idea that accessibility is at least one important factor in considering whether a book was well written. If we accept that, and you and I seem to, then as the next step I was going to ask was whether popularity was a reasonable measure of accessibility? (And if it is then popularity does have something to do with quality, even if you would not go so far as to allow that very popular books cannot be badly written.)

Last edited by gmw; 12-24-2010 at 07:07 AM.
gmw is offline   Reply With Quote